<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Association of Settlement Companies &#8211; TASC &#8211; An Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damonday.com/270/the-association-of-settlement-companies-tasc-an-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damonday.com/270/the-association-of-settlement-companies-tasc-an-introduction/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-association-of-settlement-companies-tasc-an-introduction</link>
	<description>Honest Debt Settlement and other Ethical Approaches to Debt Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loujie P.</title>
		<link>http://damonday.com/270/the-association-of-settlement-companies-tasc-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Loujie P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damonday.com/?p=270#comment-831</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read all your other articles regarding TASC. Charging up to 20% of the debt as payment is just too much. It will just serve as additional burden to an already deteriorating financial situation. Come to think of it, if one can barely pay a debt of, say, $100,000.00, how much more difficult can it get if he has to pay an additional of $20,000.00? If TASC is truly after the welfare of their clients and the consumers, as they claim to be, then, in my opinion, they should implement some sort of moderated rate that is impartial to both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read all your other articles regarding TASC. Charging up to 20% of the debt as payment is just too much. It will just serve as additional burden to an already deteriorating financial situation. Come to think of it, if one can barely pay a debt of, say, $100,000.00, how much more difficult can it get if he has to pay an additional of $20,000.00? If TASC is truly after the welfare of their clients and the consumers, as they claim to be, then, in my opinion, they should implement some sort of moderated rate that is impartial to both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debt Reduction &#8211; A Carnival of Great Articles! &#124; Reduce Debt Faster</title>
		<link>http://damonday.com/270/the-association-of-settlement-companies-tasc-an-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Debt Reduction &#8211; A Carnival of Great Articles! &#124; Reduce Debt Faster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damonday.com/?p=270#comment-160</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Damon Day submitted The Association of Settlement Companies &#8211; TASC &#8211; An Introduction.  This article is actually the first in a series exploring the truth behind The Association of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Damon Day submitted The Association of Settlement Companies &#8211; TASC &#8211; An Introduction.  This article is actually the first in a series exploring the truth behind The Association of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
